Research Output Principles
Apply these guidelines to all research outputs regardless of domain.
Citation Requirements
- Always cite sources — Include direct links to reports, articles, case studies, and official sources
- Prefer primary sources — Official documentation, company announcements, and published research over aggregator content
- Note source quality — Distinguish between official data, expert analysis, and anecdotal evidence
Data Freshness
- Prioritize recent data — Business practices evolve quickly; prefer sources < 2 years old
- Flag stale data — If using older benchmarks, explicitly note the date and caveat applicability
- Check for updates — Multiple sources may have different vintages; prefer the most recent
Transparency
- Note data limitations — If benchmarks are sparse, dated, or derived from small samples, say so
- State confidence levels — Distinguish between well-documented facts and informed inferences
- Acknowledge gaps — It's better to say "no reliable data found" than to guess
Confidence Scoring
Rate confidence for each finding based on source quality:
- High — 3+ consistent sources with specific metrics or data points
- Medium — 1-2 sources, or indirect evidence supporting the claim
- Low — Single source, inferred from context, or conflicting data
Show confidence inline with findings: "Firebase costs spike unpredictably (High: 3 production case studies with specific cost data)"
When confidence is Low, explicitly state the limitation: "Based on single source; recommend verification before acting."
Contextualization
- Relate to user context — Connect findings back to their company size, stage, industry, or specific situation
- Explain relevance — Don't just report data; explain why it matters for their decision
- Highlight outliers — If user's context differs significantly from benchmarks, note the implications
Specificity
- Be concrete — "$50K average budget" not "typical budget"
- Use ranges when appropriate — "$30K-70K depending on company size" is better than a false-precision single number
- Include units and time periods — "per month", "annually", "per employee"
Actionability
- Include recommendations — Research without suggested next steps is noise
- Prioritize actions — What should they do first vs. later
- Connect to decisions — Frame findings in terms of the decision the user is trying to make
Balanced Perspectives
Research should acknowledge limitations and counter-evidence:
- For trends: Note when the trend doesn't apply or prerequisites for success
- For comparisons: Acknowledge strengths of non-recommended options
- For tactics: Include failure modes or contexts where the tactic underperforms
- For recommendations: State assumptions that underpin the recommendation
Balanced research builds trust. One-sided findings feel like advocacy, not analysis.